Milestone 4
Lo-Fi Milestone Feedback
Here’s what I like about your completion of this milestone:
- great work flow context - loved the physical arrow
- great detail on direction of where the screen are being used
- good paper prototype to demonstrate your flow
- i like the arrow to indicate the user’s click
- awesome slides
- like the use of color
- good way to display the operation process sufficient functions
- like presentation
- good job of this milestone the clear classifications
- nice presentation that showed time & action sensitive interaction
- well prepared and animated numerous meeting features
- good drawing slides are great
- love the purple arrow and the use of different color of paper
- good sense of how buttons pop-up
- you really work hard to create the prototype, great work!
- beautiful presentation
- excellent visual presentation
- beautiful craft for prototype and slides, the arrow is clear for operation
- very detail prototype
- love the picture shots of your prototype, and detail
- very good use of ppt presentation
- visual presentation style is fun and engaging
- I really like your purple moving mouse made me feel almost like you wee on a computer
- the visual presentation was very engaging
- awesome ppt template
- nice task flows
- nice presentation (clean & informative)
Here’s where I felt there’s room for improvement on this milestone:
- may want to face audience when presenting
- when through some points very quickly, it was hard to got a sense of everything that was on the “screen”
- too fast, can’t follow
- lots of information on screen at once, need time to absorb
- not clear ahead what are the difference between menu, button because of the hand writing
- would have liked a quick summary of all options you were going to discuss (to help get bigger picture)
- how can you use this? can participant position purple arrow
- i think there are many details on each of the pages, but i learn very little thing.
- i had a hard time getting a sense of .....???
- very vast can slow down a little
- unable to highlight the sector you are talking about would have been helpful
- the problem of the white board thing, what can i do if i import more than two others’ board? or may be some one don’t have the laptop to support handwriting tune.
- dose not give an overall perspective of the interface
- wireframes do not follow a common layout
- could have went a lot slower
- hard to see broader context of software, perhaps specifying the hierarchy at the beginning would help
Here are my other commons about this milestone:
- it took me a while to catch on to what you mean by “track”
- the pointer in presentation
- some text are hard to read on slide
- I was distracted and didn’t really listen (smiley face)
- how large are the pages? how did you photograph this?
- showing the paper prototype is better than showing it in slides
- with shared white boards people can be trying to work in the same space
- very interesting presentation, very clear to see the op. flow
- lots of on-screen option are you sure users can handle
- too many steps that the user has to do
- great presentation
Here are my commons about your website:
- the typed banner on your slides often cover text on your lo-fi picture. may want to place it some where else
- Nice topic graphic
